Iraqi Resistance, not U.S., the Real 'Desert Scorpion'

Search

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
5,398
Tokens
by Abdul Hamid Ahmad
Gulf News

When Paul Bremer was named civilian governor of Iraq, he was defined as an expert in combating terrorism. Was Washington reading the future when it gave him the post so that it would be prepared for the days to come?

Those days have now come. Perhaps America will call it terrorism against its forces while others, including of course, some, not all Iraqis, will consider it resistance against the Americans.

The U.S. reactions to Iraqi attacks, which are carried out almost every day, are indications that Washington will consider them as acts of terrorism. And this was evident in its latest operation under the cover of night against what it claimed to be a training camp. The savage operation resulted in the death of about 130 unidentified Iraqis, but the pictures that were broadcast of the operation gave no clue that it was, indeed, a training camp.

The operation was followed by a disarmament and hounding campaign code named "Desert Scorpion" to destroy what the Americans claimed to be the remnants of Saddam Hussain and his defunct Baath Party.

U.S. should stop provocative acts

The code name given to such an anti-resistance operation is wrong. The scorpion is too small a creature to give chase. It hides behind rocks or digs into the sand to bite only those who are about to stamp it or come near it in self-defence.

Therefore, the code name "Desert Scorpion" should be given to the Iraqi resistance since it is an act of self-defence against the American occupation and provocations. We can even say this resistance is the Americans' own creation since the so-called remnants of Saddam and the Baath Party have discarded their weapons and fled because they do not want to fight.

America's first provocative act was its decision to disband the army, the defence and information ministries and other institutions that provided jobs to hundreds of thousands of Iraqis who now find themselves jobless. They have not even been given any promise of jobs or help. And neither have families received these promises.

The move was followed by a decision to ban all Baathists from all jobs or involvement in politics. This means the Americans have, in fact, recruited hundreds of thousands of soldiers, Baathists and others against their own forces. What do the Americans expect from people who see their decisions as oppression and acts of hostility?

The disarmament drive was another provocative act because it involved storming houses and searching cars. This operation came amidst the prevailing confusion, lack of security and increasing incidents of looting and burglaries in the middle of the day as we see on television. When Iraqi families are flagrantly robbed in public, the people have no choice but to resist and fight as long as the Americans do not ensure security for them.

We are not going into details of other daily provocative acts like harassing and searching women, and insulting men and the nationalistic feelings of the people. There are more serious provocations against the entire nation.

Let Iraqis run their own country

The Americans are trying to insult the intelligence of Iraqi citizens by not letting them run their own country and by bringing in more U.S. experts to rule the Iraqis although they have highly qualified people who are not only able to rule but to fully manage the country's political, economic and social affairs.

These deliberate attempts to marginalise the Iraqis cast doubts not only on American intentions, but also on the very existence and future of Iraq. These acts trigger Iraqi resistance and garner widespread support and sympathy for it.

It has become clear that the Americans themselves are creating the Iraqi resistance by failing to honour their promise of freedom for Iraq. More than two months after their occupation of the Arab country, the Americans have failed to bring security and dignity to the Iraqis and nor have they achieved their stated goal of freedom for Iraq. It is obvious that nothing is expected to be achieved in the near future.

It is true that the Americans in Iraq are occupation forces and the UN Security Council has given them that status although they invaded Iraq as liberation forces in the first place. Their slogan was "freedom of Iraq" - they had the chance to play the role of a liberator.

But they have veered away from that slogan and plunged deeper into the role of an occupier. By doing so, the Americans are pushing themselves into a quagmire where they will only gain more hatred and prompt the Iraqis to carry arms and resist the occupation.

The American forces will gain nothing by claiming that resistance attacks are carried out by the remnants of the Baath Party and Saddam Hussain.

Even if they are telling the truth, the resistance is a welcome development even if it comes from the devil. The resistance will escalate and will be joined by other "remnants" of the people: The more loathed the occupation becomes, the stronger and more violent the resistance will be.

The American occupation forces are, in fact, making great progress in inciting and strengthening such a resistance. The scorpion of the resistance is now in every hole, biting them every day. It is in the process of breeding into many scorpions stalking the Americans throughout Iraq.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
1,310
Tokens
Any moron could see that America would wipe out what was left of the Iraqi army sooner or later. What few people realized was that the problems would come AFTER the war was over. It's like George Boob and Donald Numbskull never had a plan or a clue what to do after "victory" was achieved. "We'll just invade them and everything will be fine". And the American people were stupid enough to fall for it.

I would like to ask the Americans here... if a foreign force invaded your country (to liberate you from the clutches of the evil Bill Clinton) and left you with no water, no power, no police, and no sign that there would be any in the near future, treated you and your countrymen like cattle and killed many of them, after economically strangling your country for 12 years causing the deaths of 100,000 of your country's children, would you pick up a gun and fight the occupying army? Damn fukking straight you would! So why villify the Iraqi people for doing it? I say... long live the Iraqi resistance!
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
1,103
Tokens
i thought that we will never have another "vietnam"

people today with tv and all the exposure are too smart this time of age to have a another vietnam, or allow one to occur.vietnam taught us we cant enter war without definate & fullproof reason to engage our troops. or we will be fighting a war we cant win.funny how only the increase number of our brave coming back in bags will open our eyes to see how history is repeating itself.

yes it is nice to save people from a ruthless dictator and makes perfect sense to us here in the usa to think this way.so why are they ungrateful and fighting and killing us? because this is reality. wake the fvuk up. they want to live like that and dont want no one to tell them how to live and rule. they are oppressed people and always will be. what is commonsense to us is not to them .those people dont think like us and dont what to, or what us to make them think that way. we are fighting or trying to change that doesnt what change and mostly from us.

at what number of deaths do we pullout?
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
5,398
Tokens
B4L, the answer to your question is "yes" of course, but don't expect it to be a popular one here or for that matter in most other places you bring it up. The Iraqis who are shooting and bombing American soldiers dead for the last three months are "Saddam sympathisers." The US will never, ever admit that there are non-Saddam supporters who are not elated to see them there. Some of the spin put on the insurgencies is hilarious; it reminds me of the old McCarthy days. As I posted here the Coalition government is so desperate for a positive sheen that it has taken control of the media in Iraq and has made it a criminal offence to speak out against the Coalition forces or government.

So ...

1) Limited power, water, and other neccessities to living like at least a Third World country, in the nation with the second-largest oil reserves in the world.

2) Curfews.

3) Military patrolling the streets of cities 24/7, raiding homes and businesses in search of *dissidents*

4) Gun ownership prohibited.

5) Media censored.

6) Crimes against fellow Iraqis meriting a fraction of the punishment the same crime committed against a Coalition soldier or representative will get you.

7) Repeated changes to the date that any sort of election will be held, with the latest change being to "indefinitely postpone" them until "order is restored" (nevermind that indefinitely postponing elections creates a condition ideal for constant unrest, thereby putting off the restoration of order indefintiely.)

Yeah, that is some kind of liberty. What amazes/amuses me the most is, so many Americans have no problem with this at all, yet if any two of the above seven conditions were applied to the US on Monday, there would be dead politicians swinging from light posts at sunrise on Tuesday.


Phaedrus
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
2,299
Tokens
I applaud the use of the word "sheen" in the first paragraph...

because propaganda is the only thing with lustre in that bombed out moonscape.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,149
Messages
13,564,578
Members
100,752
Latest member
gamebet888host
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com